[4 in 1] USB C Car Charger, 4-Port 90W Super Fast Charging Cigarette Lighter Adapter, Dual 45W USBC & USB-A Multiport Car Phone Charger Accessories for iPhone 17 16 15 14 13 12, iPad, Galaxy, Tablet

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
This USB-C car charger works fast and reliably every time I use it. It fits snugly in the outlet, charges devices quickly, and doesn’t overheat during longer drives. I like having multiple ports so everything stays powered without fighting over a charger. A simple, dependable upgrade for the car.

I Have the Power… of 90W and No One Can Stop Me Now
Let me tell you something: this [4-in-1] USB-C Car Charger, 4-Port 90W beast didn’t just charge my phone — it charged my entire outlook on life.I plugged it in, and suddenly my car felt less like a 10-year-old commuter vehicle and more like a high-tech command center powered by caffeine and pure electricity. My passengers audibly gasped. My iPhone went from 12% to 80% faster than I could say, “No, we are not stopping for snacks again.”Four ports. Ninety watts. That’s not a charger — that’s a statement. A declaration of independence from dead batteries and slow charging shame. You get two USB-C ports and two USB-A ports, which is tech speak for: You can charge everything, all at once, and still have room to judge people with one-port chargers.I charged my phone, my tablet, a friend’s phone, and a portable speaker simultaneously — and I swear the charger didn’t even break a sweat. I think it might be alive. It glowed with this subtle, futuristic light like it knows it’s the chosen one.Also, it fits in the cigarette lighter socket like it was born there. No rattling, no weird wiggling, just solid “I’m here to work” energy.Now every time someone enters my car and sees this thing, they say, “Whoa, what is that?” and I say, “That… is 90 watts of pure charging power, and yes, it is as awesome as it looks.”Buy it. Your devices will thank you. Your passengers will respect you. And your old 12W charger will cry softly in a drawer, knowing its time is over.

If you need to charge multiple devices this is for you.
Need to charge phone’s and tablet when working. This does it all plus headphones.Seems to charge well and consistently.

Very Good
Works really good, has super fast charging for real and the good thing also is that it has 4 USB ports to charge 4 devices all at once. I recommend it.

Another hit brought to you by our friends at “Heyuan Renzhl Technology Co.”!What do I mean by that? Well though these are branded “Junvang” in this particular listing, and sold by “Witpro” the truth is this “type” of “car charger” are mass produced and sold under a myriad of “brands” on Amazon and elsewhere, all being made by the aforementioned company. That’s a good thing because these are very good bang for the buck chargers.What do I mean by “another”? Well good ol’ HRT shall we call them? They make a smaller version of this which has three ports instead of four–2 type-C + 1 A-port. I had reviewed that three-port version before but unfortunately the listing I reviewed it on has disappeared along with my review 🙁 Anyway I have pictured the two side by side for size comparison (first two photos) with this one on the right side. This four-port version is about 38mm diameter while the three-port version is 31mm. I’ll save you the calculation–it means this one is about 50% larger in “area on the front face”. The 4-port version is also very slightly longer in total length–will stick out a tiny bit more from your car’s lighter socket.For the “short version/TLDR review” with just the +/- points:+Very good output with up to 45W x 2.+Four ports in total (2 C + 2 A).+Mostly alloy/metal construction (tip/end is plastic).+Works with 12-24V input (vehicle voltage) so can be used on vehicle types which run on 24V systems.+Good power distribution between ports/with multiple used.+Good breakdown of capabilities and distribution printed on side, plus helpful diagrams in the listing.+Very well priced for what you get.-“90W” is sort of a misnomer, you cannot get that much power for a single device.-45W only attainable with devices that can use 15V or 20V modes. Otherwise 36W max at 12V; 24W max at 9V; etc.-Power distribution is a little complicated/tricky, unlike the 3-port version where it’s very straight forward and easy to remember.-No fuse in these. They may have various IC-based protections built in but that’s unknown.➡Much more in-depth look in a Q&A type format I decided upon:Q: What makes these HRT car “chargers” (they are really USB power supplies but everyone calls them “chargers”), special/better, compared to a lot of the other ones out there?A: Their multi-port power split/distribution. Many with more than one port get completely hobbled or current-limited when you plug more than one device in. E.g. if you plug in two devices you will lose PD (go to 5V only) and then have some meagre 7.5W output on each port, or something along those lines. This is also the case for many of the “big brands” out there. It’s pretty disappointing if you want to use more than one port.While these may seem like they are “no name chargers” they are, to me, the best kind to get. Because you can potentially get full power out of the C ports if only those two are used; and because they are inexpensive. In this case that’s 45W x 2 which is impressive. Note that this is not entirely unique and there *are* other products out there that can do this; but, they tend to be very few and far between, and also more expensive. “On paper” they are indeed better than the majority of what’s in the market IMO.Q: 45W? I thought these were 90W? How do I get the full 90W out of these?A: The the “90W” they are talking about here…it’s a total combined rating. It is much more accurately stated as “45W x 2” not “90W”. They are not truly “90W” capable–you cannot get that out of a single port *and* to get that much power so don’t plan on [passengers] hooking up some high end gaming laptop for a road trip or something. You also have to have two devices that can both pull 45W and can negotiate/use either 20V or 15V PD. At 12V, you are maxing out at 36W instead and it goes down from there at lower voltages. The good news is, again unlike a lot of other car adapters, these have [most of] the power distribution profile printed right on the side (picture# 3). The listing photos depict this graphically, which is nice, but they don’t mention the fact that 45W is only achieved at 15/20V.**I also noticed one other “electrical discrepancy” here.** The input rating is 12-24V with a max of 6.5A. At 12.0V that’s only 78W it can draw from the socket. While DC-DC converters tend to be 90%+ efficient, they still can’t be over 100% that much should be obvious! However, we may be able to get “almost there” if we use a peak 14.4V as the supply voltage–that would take us just over 90W input. Using the more realistic real-world voltage of 13.8V it’s dipping a bit under that. So either you don’t really get a full 45W x 2 on a 12V vehicle, or it’s going to have to draw more than the 6.5A printed on the side. I’m not able to test this immediately so YMMV on how this works out in practice. It’s safe to say 45W is a “sure thing”, getting that *x2*…may end up being slightly below that in reality.Q: How does this compare power-wise to the smaller three-port version?A: The smaller one maxes out at “67W” total (37W + 30W on the two C ports) and it also can only go up to 12V PD, whereas this one can supply 15 and 20V additionally, at 3A and 2.25A respectively, to get to the 45W. TBH I don’t know why the 3-port says “37W” BTW, it’s really 36W (12V @ 3A) but that’s just splitting hairs.A2: The power distribution profiles are a bit different. The smaller type basically links the second C-port to the A-port meaning power on that second port is always affected when you plug something into the A-port. But the top C-port is essentially “independent” and can always supply the 36W. On this/4-port version the distribution is a little more complicated and that top port can indeed be affected when you load other port(s). Because there’s no good way of explaining it without saying a bunch of “except when…” lines, you are best just looking at the diagrams in the listing!I would note if you are planning on using one C-port and one A-port on the 4-port version, the rule of thumb is to always use the “two outside” ports or the “two inside” ports; other combinations the output will be severely hobbled to 5V/1.5A (7.5W) on each of the two ports. It’s a bit odd but yeah, look at the diagram.Q: Which one should you get, between the 3 and 4 -port versions?Short A: *I* would say the 3-port is better for most that will “just be charging phones”. If you’ll be potentially charging/powering laptops and tablets, you’d want to get the 4-port. (Most phones don’t charge at as much as 30W, never mind over that; but there are some out there that do.)Long A: It depends on what devices you plan on using. Something like a laptop probably won’t *run* on the 3-port version because these tend to require 20V output which the 3-port model cannot supply. It may charge the battery… slowly (YMMV)…but not truly be powered by the adapter. Similarly a tablet that can do 45W charging (for example) probably needs to do so with 15V/3A, which again can’t be provided by the 3-port. However tablets will often still work fine with lesser voltage available as they don’t have the operating-power requirements of a laptop.OTOH the 3-port is significantly smaller “on the face” and might fit better in some vehicles’ socket areas, where the 4-port is too large.And if you are going to use “all the ports” the 3-port version always allows that top port to provide full 36W output. With the 4-port loading all four results in the “7.5W problem” again, across all four. And, loading multiple ports in general is more confusing on the 4-port w/regard to figuring out “which ones are best to use”. The diagrams provide this information but it’s not exactly something you’re going to want to print and keep as a “quick reference guide”./end Q&AFinal thing to talk about, and perhaps the only significant con, is the lack of a fuse in the tip. Most things that plug into your lighter socket have a fuse. Typically that fuse sits between the spring and the tip. As you can see (picture#4) the spring just contacts the tip directly, with no fuse in between. This is the same on both chargers from HRT. I expect the vast majority of people will not have any idea about this nor why it has any importance as they’ll just “buy and plug in”, but just a note that the only fusing you are relying upon, that of the fuse on the circuit in your vehicle. If you have a lighter socket that is “always powered” even with the car off, you probably DO NOT want to leave these plugged in. One you are going to drain your battery to some degree; but more importantly you don’t want to have “something go wrong” (e.g. smoke, fire) in a car that’s just sitting in a driveway/parking lot where you can do nothing to stop/save the situation.Conclusion!:Overall I really like these chargers from HRT (both types). They offer nice construction/solid quality; good price points; great multi-port power; AND a pretty good explanation and breakdown of said multi-port use. Overall winners in my book. I don’t love that it lacks a fuse, but I’m not so paranoid/cautious that I’ll take a star off for it.

There was a time when I was struggling to find a decent car charger for my phone. I really need one for an aging phone when it’s also my primary navigation device for long-distance driving. All the ones bought from local electronics stores failed after only 4 or 5 uses.Then I discovered these gems. They come in two and they are absolute power houses, especially when you connect only one device to them. They support fast charging and quickly bring your phone battery up to 100% even when data AND screen are constantly on for GPS guidance. I haven’t had to connect multiple devices to this charger, however, I have heard that they stop fast charging when more than one devices are connected.When plugged in, while the engine is on, rims of the charger’s outer end and actual ports have nice blue glow that come in very handy at night or in any dark environment.A surprising thing about these chargers is that they don’t seem to get very hot; they get barely warm, unlike the ones that I have used in the past. It makes me wonder if the chargers don’t produce as much heat as the ones from the past or the outer material doesn’t let the heat dissipate. It’s an important question, in my opinion. Because in the first case, it’s a good thing, but in the second case failure is imminent. Only long-term use can tell.My complaint about these chargers might very well be a good thing too. They are quite stiff and are very hard to plug in. You need to use significantly more force than expected.The long and short of it is that so far, I haven’t had any complaints with these chargers and I have used them with both USB-A and USB-C cables with similar results.